Vlad Uraschiv The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors

1. On 31 July 2025 the Respondent filed an application for the Appellant’s appeal to be struck out pursuant to rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 on the basis that, as the Appellant passed Part 1 of the test on 15 May 2023, he can no longer fulfil the condition contained in regulation 3(4)(c) of the Motor Cars (Driving Instruction) Regulations 2005. 2. By a direction dated 31 July 2025, Registrar Woollard directed that the Appellant must by 15 August 2025 confirm whether the appeal is withdrawn or make representations as to why the appeal should not be struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. 3. Having considered all the papers in this appeal, I am satisfied that there is no reasonable prospect of the Appeal succeeding because more than two years have elapsed since the Appellant passed Part 1 of the test on 15 May 2023, and accordingly, I find that as a matter of fact he can no longer fulfil the condition contained in regulation 3(4)(c) of the Motor Cars (Driving Instruction) Regulations 2005. 4. The appeal is therefore struck out under Rule 8(3)c because there is no reasonable prospect of it succeeding.